Au cœur de la première connexion française à l’ARPAnet
The Most Popular TLDs Queried plot shows the types of queries for each TLD.
Click on one of the plot subtypes in the left-side menu to see a subset of TLDs.
Click on the legend to view the queries for a specific type.
Kaspersky
Threat Intelligence Portal
Check you file !!!
SnipAway
The customizable snippet manager made for developers and people who work with code.
Vue logo
vue-simple-alert examples (1.0.2)
www. is not deprecated
really
Why use www?
This page is intended for webmasters who are looking for information about whether or not to use www in their canonical web site URLs.
First, a bit of terminology. The domain name without www is sometimes referred to as a naked domain, and I’ll refer to it as such here.
Why should I use www?
You should use www because today you have a small web site, and tomorrow you want a big web site. Really big.
The technical reasons to use www primarily apply to the largest web sites which receive millions (or more) of page views per day, web sites with a large number of services across several subdomains, and virtually any web site hosted in “the cloud” by an application service provider.
Heroku, for instance, strongly recommends against using naked domains. When using a provider such as Heroku or Akamai to host your web site, the provider wants to be able to update DNS records in case it needs to redirect traffic from a failing server to a healthy server. This is set up using DNS CNAME records, and the naked domain cannot have a CNAME record. This is only an issue if your site gets large enough to require highly redundant hosting with such a service. But who doesn’t want their site to get that large? In order to not use www, you will have to run your own server farms and you will be unable to use such services to their fullest extent. (See also: Why does Heroku warn against “naked” domain names?)
Another reason has to do with cookies. One common web site optimization is to serve static content from a subdomain, such as static.example.com. If you are using www, then this is no problem; your site’s cookies won’t be sent to the static subdomain (unless you explicitly set them up to do so). If you use the naked domain, the cookies get sent to all subdomains (by recent browsers that implement RFC 6265), slowing down access to static content, and possibly causing caching to not work properly. The only way to get around this problem and keep the naked domain is to buy a second domain name just for your static content. Twitter, for instance, which does not use www, had to buy new domain names just for static content. Of course, if you explicitly share your cookies across all your subdomains, for instance to implement single sign-on across various services on subdomains of your site (Google does this), then you too would have to buy a new domain name in this circumstance anyway. (See also: What’s the point in having “www” in a URL?)
Speaking of cookies, if you decide to use the naked domain, but want to put services on subdomains and share cookies between them, you’ll quickly find out that it doesn’t work right in all cases unless you have a subdomain set the cookie — and then it doesn’t work for the naked domain. The fix for this is to use RFC 6265 (formerly RFC 2965) cookies, which can be shared between the naked domain and subdomains, but some popular web application packages still do not implement RFC 2965 properly or at all, let alone RFC 6265. (See also: Can subdomain.example.com set a cookie that can be read by example.com?)
You may not run into any of these issues today, but as your web site grows, you eventually will. Using www today and in the future makes you more prepared to handle the challenges of growing a web site beyond a single server. It can be done without using www in many circumstances, but it’s much easier with.
Should I redirect no-www to www?
Yes.
Redirection ensures that visitors who type in your URL reach you regardless of which form they use, and also ensures that search engines index your canonical URLs properly.
BootstrapCDN
The recommended CDN for Bootstrap, Font Awesome and Bootswatch.
Follow @getbootstrapcdn [Privacy Badger a remplacé ce bouton Twitter.] Looking for a premium icon sets? Check out Iconfinder!
Font Awesome
Font Awesome CSS
Graffiti on Commission
If you’re looking for a graffiti design, you’ve came to the right place! Beautiful custom illustrations in top quality, high resolution and ready for print and publishing. Full commercial copyright is included with every order!
A guide to basic CSS resources
jenniferlynparsons profile image Jennifer Lyn Parsons
CSS is a broad topic as the styling language is more complex than it appears at the surface. The more modern additions of grid, flexbox, and various animation tools (not to mention preprocessors!) has made the topic difficult to sum up in a guide such as this. That said, for this guide I have selected the courses, articles, and other resources that I've found most helpful or return to on a regular basis.
archive.today
sauvegarde de page web
courrielblogquestionsFAQfaire un don
BOOKMARKLET:Glissez ce boutonarchive.todaydans votre barre d'outils et vous pourrez sauvegarder une page web en un seul clic!
Mon url est active et je veux archiver son contenu
Archive.today est votre machine à voyager dans le temps personnelle!
Il prend un 'cliché' instantané d'une page web qui sera en ligne même si la page originale disparaît.
Il sauvegarde le texte et une copie graphique de la page pour plus de précision.
Il raccourci aussi les URLs tout comme tinyurl, goo.gl et bit.ly.
Il peut sauvegarder les pages du Web 2.0:
https://archive.fo/2013.05.01/http://nickqizhu.github.io/dc.js/
https://archive.fo/2014.06.26/https://www.google.com/maps/…Ceci peut être utile si vous voulez prend un cliché d'une page qui pourrait changer rapidement: une liste de prix, une offre d'emploi, une annonce immobilière, un article de blog écrit sous l'influence de l'alcool, ...
Les pages sauvegardées n'auront aucun élément actif et aucun script donc elles vous gardent à l'abri des fenêtres intempestives et des maliciels!
Comment réduire la consommation de CPU de Windows Defender ?
@Korben —
8 octobre 2019
Vous l’ignorez peut-être, mais si vous utilisez Windows, sachez que l’outil Defender présent dans Windows 10 est très respectable. Dans de nombreux tests que j’ai pu lire sur les antivirus et autres firewalls, il se classe toujours très bien.
Windows Defender sait se faire oublier et fonctionne principalement en tâche de fond. Il observe l’arrivée de nouveaux fichiers, les scanne, surveille les connexions et bien sûr lance un petit scan complet de votre système de temps en temps lorsque vous ne l’utilisez pas.
doka .photo
Edit images without leaving your browser
Select a picture
…or drop an image on the page to get started.
Tap on one of the images below for a quick demo.
We don't upload anything,
everything happens in your browser.
doka .photo
Made with Doka.js
Input™
Fonts for code from DJR & Font Bureau
Développeurs, vous devriez avoir honte — Règles de mots de passe
BREAKING BAD Generator Typo
Générateur de typo à la façon breaking bad !
Best image from NASA
